Webextension support is planned for 2.57.
> Then, the best thing to do would be abandoning SM by using from now FF and
TB exclusively ?
The first one becomes a permanent construction site with a more primitive ui
in each version and functionality loss and the second one struggles too but is
so far able to keep up. So have fun if you go this way.
FRG
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote on 11-09-18 10:56:
Ray_Net wrote on 11/09/2018 3:58 PM:
Example:
Now I can use adblock_plus-2.9.1-an+fx+sm+tb.xpi into SM
but I cannot use adblock_plus-3.0.1-an+fx.xpi into SM
Because the addon-interface is different for the new FF.
Would SM be modified in such a way that an addon for the new FF can be
loaded/used by SM ?
Or SM will stay with the old addon-interface FOREVER ?
Ray, I am not sure, but I think your problem may be tied up in FF moving
from the old xpi type of extension to what I think they now call the
Webextension format.
SM has not, yet, moved to the Webextension format ... and, due to the lack
of Developer Workforce, they may never get there!!
Then, the best thing to do would be abandoning SM by using from now FF and TB
exclusively ?
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
