Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 22/10/2018 10:18 PM:
 >
> FRG, I've seen "l10n builds", and the problems with it, mentioned for years.
 > *What is it* ?? A Real World language?? A Programming language?? What??
 >

Basically all non en-US foreign language builds. Or your native language build. Stricktly speaking en-US is an l10n build too but the master here and building differently so we are not calling it l10n.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/L10n

> But I'm guessing this would make the devs job a hell of a lot more difficult.

Not possible without modularized parts. And Firefox goes in a different direction with what they call Gecko today. This more or and more becomes a bloated mess mixing frontend browser parts with backend Gecko parts. Otherwise it would be easier to stay current.

FRG

Thanks for that, FRG.

--
Daniel

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171016030418

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to