Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 22/10/2018 10:18 PM:
>
> FRG, I've seen "l10n builds", and the problems with it, mentioned for
years.
> *What is it* ?? A Real World language?? A Programming language?? What??
>
Basically all non en-US foreign language builds. Or your native language
build. Stricktly speaking en-US is an l10n build too but the master here
and building differently so we are not calling it l10n.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/L10n
> But I'm guessing this would make the devs job a hell of a lot more
difficult.
Not possible without modularized parts. And Firefox goes in a different
direction with what they call Gecko today. This more or and more becomes
a bloated mess mixing frontend browser parts with backend Gecko parts.
Otherwise it would be easier to stay current.
FRG
Thanks for that, FRG.
--
Daniel
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171016030418
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey