NFN Smith wrote on 2/05/2019 1:26 AM:
Daniel wrote:
NFN Smith wrote on 30/04/2019 1:49 AM:
Felix Miata wrote:
I do find it amusing that there is a site that will accept Seamonkey,
but only if it's not advertising itself as Firefox compatible.
Thinking along these lines, could it be that the site/s detects the FF52
in the Useragent string and realises that that is an ollddd
version of FF so the site thinks it cannot present its site optimised
for an 'up-to-date' browser, so complains??
I think that's what's happening. As soon as the script sees Firefox 52,
it throws up the warning for an unsupported browser and download links
to current versions of Chrome and Firefox (and others).
Smith
So if the OP were to add a UserAgent override line specifically for that
site to think the OP is using, say, FF66, his problem might be solved!
--
Daniel
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171016030418
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
