Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
As a point of comparison, I have Firefox 69.0 on the same machine,
that has several extensions (especially NoScript and AdBlock
Plus), and that one performs at a level I pretty much expect.
Since this is not a working machine, I can do lots of testing
without disrupting any active profiles.
Smith
Make sure you are running NoScript 5.1.9 and the latest classic
uBlock 1.16.4.11 Latest AdBlock+ 2.91 and 2.53 also do not mix well.
A good reminder.
In my regular Seamonkey installation I have both, and copies of the the
.XPI downloads for both NoScript and uBlock in my archives.
For the testing installation, at least for now, I'm trying to stick as
closely as I can to default configs, and I hadn't planned to do anything
with extensions. In one sense, it is useful to see how pages truly
appear without blocking of scripts and ads, but if I do very much with
that particular profile, I'll eventually find the ads sufficiently
intrusive that I resort to ad blocking.
Smith
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
