Daniel wrote:
Daniel wrote on 11/06/2020 7:20 PM:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 11/06/2020 12:11 PM:
Ant wrote:
On 6/10/2020 2:20 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Ant wrote:
Mine went over 3 GB of RAM for its working set, 4.5 GB for its
peak working set, and almost 30K of page faults. It was mostly
caused by many tabs of YouTube.com in my decade old, updated
64-bit W7 HPE SP1 PC (6 GB of RAM). :(
Thank you for reading and hopefully answering. :)
I have never seen mine above 650k.
Don't you mean 650 MB?
You are correct. I meant MB... accidentally left off 3 zeros.
I currently have 5 separate instances of SM open to test
and am using 485,904K.
I don't have a win7 disk cache. Ram cache only.
https://www.foxnews.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SB-qEYVdvXA (cute kitties)
https://nmap.org/
https://avcams.faa.gov/sitelist.php
https://radar.weather.gov/Conus/centgrtlakes_loop.php
How about opening more YouTube's videos and other bloated web sites
(LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, etc.)? ;)
Why would I want to watch more than one youtube vid at a time?
:) I don't belong to Link, Face, or Twit.
What?? Can't your brain multi-task, Paul??
Sorry, Paul, I forgot the ;-P after my last! ;-(
That's ok. I had assumed so and thought it was quite funny!
:)
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
