Steve Wendt wrote:
On 11/20/2020 1:22 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Personally I am not impressed by the format. Looks impressive on paper only.
I doubt anyone other than google needs it in the real world and they are now
already working on webp2.
I found this nice article a while back:
https://siipo.la/blog/is-webp-really-better-than-jpeg
Yes I read this too and agree. But I don't think it is even worth it for small
images.
Personally I think compression level has reached a peak. Everything you do now
compromises quality in some way.
Still using good old zip too. Compression is not that good but very convenient
to have something which works on almost every system out of the box. Same with
gif, png and jpeg. If something comes around which does this we can talk
again. webp and almost anything developed by google isn't it. Unfortunately
needs to be supported to an extent too.
FRG (backwards yokel)
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
