I agree that it is essential for nodes to be able to change HTL arbitrarily. To my knowledge, Freenet doesn't implement arbitrary HTL increases. It only decreases HTL. Are their any plans to change this?
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Shimmin > Sent: Sunday, 07 July, 2002 10:22 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Tech] Re: Mailing list and Micropayments > > > > On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, u Uler wrote: > > > What about people who want to be guaranteed that they get a > hit. Chris said > > that he would like to be able to set his HTL to 255 and scour > the network > > for the data he wants. > > But a node's freedom to arbitrarily change the HTL of any search passing > through it is an important part of the protocol. Not least because it > would be difficult to prevent nodes from doing it anyway, and if you can't > eliminate cancer nodes from the network, you can just re-define their > behavior as non-cancerous. > > But also, this freedom to arbitrarily alter of HTL is a central part of > Freenet's plausible deniability doctrine. Requesting from a node with HTL > 1 doesn't indicate the presence of data on the node, because the node > might have upped the search's HTL and passed it on. > > Furthermore, if the HTL of a request actually means something, then the > network becomes more vulnerable to traffic analysis. Allowing nodes to > arbitrarily change HTL ensures that all the meta-information in a packet > is potentially untrustworthy to someone wishing to map out the network or > its behavior based on this information. > > --RS > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > _______________________________________________ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
