but 525 seems to be working fine. should those users who are experiencing no difficulties w/ 525 update to 0502?
At 10:09 PM 10/29/2002 +0000, you wrote: >Freenet 0.5.0.2 is now available for download. Please upgrade to this >version, and inform us of any problems. This includes some important >load balancing code that should help the network to get out of the dire >state it is in following Monday's release and slashdotting. You can get >the Windows installer from: >http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/freenet/freenet-webinstall.exe?download >You can get the unix tarball from: >http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/freenet/freenet-0.5.0.2.tar.gz?download >You can contact us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] (subscribe first, >http://hawk.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support/ ). > >We do not expect to produce new releases daily in future; this is >because of extraordinary circumstances. Yes, freenet did work, very >well, the day before we released and got slashdotted... :) > >The source code is also available from CVS (branch rel-0-5-1), or on >sourceforge. >-- >Matthew Toseland >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. >Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. >http://freenetproject.org/ > >Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\eudora\attach\[freenet-support] Freenet 0.5.0" > _______________________________________________ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
