I continue to use 525. It seems to kick ass. here are some stats: Uptime 2 days 13 hours 22 minutes localRequestsPerHour: 25.139694 load: 25%
incoming: # unique contacts: 233, active connections: 2 # format: <contact attempts> <successful> <active connections> <address> # 1128 1128 0 tcp/209.210.55.3 464 464 0 tcp/217.0.226.33 302 302 0 tcp/217.0.226.111 302 302 0 tcp/143.248.234.149 292 292 0 tcp/12.231.53.84 253 253 0 tcp/130.234.180.63 232 232 0 tcp/217.155.34.23 197 197 0 tcp/128.211.145.133 175 175 0 tcp/213.208.109.228 175 175 0 tcp/209.221.197.10 150 150 0 tcp/213.139.166.100 148 148 0 tcp/203.7.159.18 139 139 0 tcp/62.123.53.184 119 119 0 tcp/66.25.132.47 115 115 0 tcp/217.0.226.48 114 114 0 tcp/68.13.125.189 113 113 0 tcp/131.215.43.203 111 111 0 tcp/217.0.226.45 108 108 0 tcp/217.75.103.8 92 92 0 tcp/66.26.200.14 etc. I uploaded 526mb of data using frost successfully @ around 14.5 kbps I can retrieve data at surprising speed. dled a 5mb mp3 @ 22kbps I can find many freesites, etc. Perhaps users should stick with 525? _______________________________________________ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
