On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 03:27:54PM -0500, Doug Bostrom wrote: > Greetings, > > 534 seems to be running just great. For me there's just one remaining problem, which >is that I still don't seem > to be able to get bandwidth under control. > > I have things pinched off to 10K up and down, on the premise that since we're on >ADSL here I can't allow more That's the combined limit or the individual limits? > relayed data inward than my upstream connection can push out. There's some >confusion about whether we're 128k No reason not to have asymmetrical limits. > or 384k upstream. Our service agreement says 384k, but maybe that's on a good day >with a tailwind; most of the > time the upstream connection performs like 128k. So I'm erring on the safe side and >setting things at 10K, > which seems only marginally useful but ought to work and leave some overhead for >other services to negotiate > connections. I use 20k down, 5k up, on a 512/128 cable modem (I have three nodes in this configuration on the same machine, but they're not heavily loaded). Are you sure you aren't running any other bandwidth hogging apps? If you set it to 5k up, does the situation improve? > > Our pipe is still saturated after a few hours of freenet uptime. > > My spouse and I both work at home at least 50% of the time. Yesterday I >absentmindedly referred to shutting > down the freenet node here when Ann was desperately trying to get some work done. >Big mistake! Busted! Now of > course when things are slow I'm getting the question "you don't have that THING >turned on again, do you?", heh. > > Does bandwidth control take into account relayed data, ie data transiting my node as >a result of indirection? > And do you have any further tips I might apply to getting this to work? Very >frustrating to see things working > so well that I can't support a persistent node anymore! It takes into account everything, except for traffic to non-internet addresses. > > Thanks for any help that may be forthcoming. > > > > > > -- > "Democracies die behind closed doors." > - Judge Damon Keith >
-- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/1/03 http://freenetproject.org/
msg02103/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
