There appears to be no problem for transient nodes.  And presumably most
running permanent ones know how this thing works.  Good luck.

> [Original Message]
> From: GeckoX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 1/25/2003 8:37:38 AM
> Subject: [freenet-support] Always keep old freenet builds
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hopefully with the problems that people had with 544, they shouldn't have 
> any problem with the new 547 problems. Just rollback the build to the
last 
> known good build, 546 and you'll be good to go.
>
> Now, if one didn't learn from the 544 problems and didn't backup their
old 
> version before upgrading, there's not much that can be done...
>
> :GeckoX
>
> - -- 
> - --------------------------------
> Freedom is slavery.
> Ignorance is strength.
> War is peace.
>                 -- George Orwell
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE+MpMeSMrcfZpjDKERAqzfAKCBoZ2d+2sGmgJJkEVkDRAKSWW4ugCfd4Y2
> NvAuDo7GmFIZsUyAP9z6E7o=
> =2eaj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> support mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support




_______________________________________________
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

Reply via email to