-----Original Message----- > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 19:29:38 +0000 > From: Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Old Freenet > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 06:04:17PM +0000, Andrew Dickson wrote: >> Let's face it, freenet was working brilliantly this >> time last year... Content was slow, but it was >> accessible. At the moment freenet is dead in the >> water. > The unstable network on the other hand is working pretty well. We should > be merging the code in the next week or so, however the unstable network > *is* rather small (100 nodes or so). Anyone who is willing to provide > bug reports and upgrade their nodes daily should try the unstable branch > however. >> >> Why is the stable network not reverting back to the >> older code until these new bugs are ironed out? Actually I have wondered a great deal about this myself. Why did Freenet break in the first place and - assuming that it happened through an error introduced by an update about a year ago - why wasn't the stable version reverted to the last working version, so we could have avoided paralyzing the entire net for a year? Even if the fix is allmost ready for the big launch, the other issues would be interesting to know about, just for historical reasons. Regards, Jesper _______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support