On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 07:20:23PM +0000, Wayne McDougall wrote: > Stephen P. Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I started a freenet node four days ago, using the default freenet.conf > > settings, adjusted for being behind a firewall. A couple days later I > > increased the storage to 1G, which required restarting fred. A couple > > days after that I increased the storage to 30G, again restarting fred. > > I'm using the latest stable with Sun JDK 1.4.1 on RH8.0 and an approx. > > 200Mbitps cable modem. > > I *think* that freenet.conf is set by default to assume as 256Kbits connection > (based on a rule of thumb of setting limits to half bandwidth capacity). > > You would want to adjust: > > inputBandwidthLimit=12500000 > and > outputBandwidthLimit=12500000
LOL. There is no way he has a 200 megabit cable modem. Such things don't exist... > > Those suggested values are in bytes. You may want to adjust, but the default > values would be too low. > > I'm no expert, but I'd strongly urge you to consider the 1.4.2 Java release: > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/download.html Get 1.4.2-05 if you do. 04 had some serious problems.. > > > It's working, kindof. netstat -t -a shows lots of incoming connections > > to the public port. > > What does FRED have to say for itself? > > http://127.0.0.1:8888/servlet/nodeinfo/networking/ocm > > Have you got active transmitting inbound and outbound connections? > > > I'm disappointed that the latency on more that half > > my retrievals has been in hours; some requests are going into their > > second day. I've had one retrieval succeed after 16 hours. Someone > [SNIP] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]/YoYo// > > Data Not found > > > > Is this what I should expect? Will it get better over time as I become > > better connected? > > No it's not what you should expect, and yes it will get better. > My personal experience (counts for very little) is that it took 9 days to > become better connected - then suddenyl everything started working > beautifully. You may do better than that with better bandwidth and the > improved Freenet versions. But I'd wait at least that long to see how good > things might be. NINE DAYS?! Yikes. > > > I'm seeing no inordinate load on my machine (Linux); > > top says the CPU stays between 80 and 90% idle. After two days, only 2G > > of the 30G I most recently allocated has been consumed. > > Only 2 Gb would be filled over two days at the default bandwidth rate of > 12 000 (versus my suggestion of 12 500 000)! -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]