The truly parnoid could use a ssh tunnel to link their node to only a few trusted nodes. ~Paul
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:03:37 +0000 (UTC), phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > No. All inter-node communications are encrypted. Separately, all data is > > encrypted at the file level. > > OK welcome to blab-out-my-arse-ville!! I'm glad to be corrected & clearly need > to study-up on freenet more. Thanks for your patience. > > > I don't see that it's relevant to the legal issue at stake.. > > I guess the point was that the cache on its own never used to be enough, and the > apparent trend toward further loosening of evidence standards. > > > > Some of them are referring to running a > > node, and then analysing the requests that come in. This is difficult, > > as demonstrated above and for other reasons, but especially with > > splitfiles, it is not impossible. Also there may be traffic analysis > > vulnerabilities, with a sufficiently smart and powerful attacker. > > > > Any ideas about how much 'not impossible'? > > Thanks again, amphibian one. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
