On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 01:48:12PM +0200, Anonymous wrote: > >On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 07:47:50AM -0000, Toad wrote: > >> As of build 5088 I'm getting startup times in excess of 145 minutes. > > > >Is it swapping much? > > yes, disk is in full thrash.. cpu maxed. other processes grinding to a > halt. > > >> This is counting from initiating freenet startup, to freenet being ready to > >> deliver the web interface at 127.0.0.1:8888 in the browser. > >> > >> latest everything, win98se > >> > >> P 233 > > > >How much RAM? How big datastore? What are the timings? i.e. show me the > >log of the startup at logLevel=normal. > > 64mb (best this mb will do)
Yikes. Well, good luck. :) I will try to do something about memory usage seeding the RT, we're getting many many complaints about it. > > here's the log of last startup: > > Aug 6, 2004 2:40:01 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Starting Freenet > (Fred) 0.5 node, build #5090 on JVM Sun Microsystems Inc.:Java HotSpot(TM) > Client VM:1.4.1_03-b02 > INFO: Native CPUID library > 'freenet/support/CPUInformation/jcpuid-x86-windows.dll' loaded from > resource > INFO: Optimized native BigInteger library > 'net/i2p/util/jbigi-windows-pentiummmx.dll' loaded from resource > Aug 6, 2004 2:40:08 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, ERROR): overloadHigh set > to 80% - this will NOT WORK with rate limiting > Aug 6, 2004 2:40:13 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loading node > keys: node > Aug 6, 2004 2:40:14 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Read node file > Aug 6, 2004 2:40:16 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): starting > filesystem > Aug 6, 2004 2:40:19 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loading data > store > Aug 6, 2004 2:40:19 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loading routing > table > Aug 6, 2004 2:40:20 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): From input: > 1024.0 > Aug 6, 2004 2:40:20 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Setting default > initTransferRate to 1024.0 > Aug 6, 2004 2:40:21 PM (freenet.node.rt.NGRoutingTable, main, NORMAL): > Loading estimators > Aug 6, 2004 2:40:22 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Created new NGRT > Aug 6, 2004 2:40:23 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Loaded stats > Aug 6, 2004 2:40:23 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loading temp > bucket factory > Aug 6, 2004 2:40:23 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loaded temp > bucket factory > Aug 6, 2004 2:40:23 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Loaded bucket > factory > Aug 6, 2004 4:55:04 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): read seed nodes > Aug 6, 2004 4:55:04 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Initial refs > count: 2, seeds: 607 > Aug 6, 2004 4:55:04 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): not seeding > routing table > Aug 6, 2004 4:55:06 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): saved routing > table > Aug 6, 2004 4:55:06 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): starting node > Aug 6, 2004 4:55:17 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Detected Windows > 98/ME. Limiting connections accordingly. To get rid of this message, use a > proper operating system - sorry > Aug 6, 2004 4:55:19 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loading service: > mainport > Aug 6, 2004 4:55:23 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loading service: > distribution > Aug 6, 2004 4:55:24 PM > (freenet.interfaces.servlet.SingleHttpServletContainer, main, NORMAL): > Loading the single servlet distribution.params.servlet > Aug 6, 2004 4:55:25 PM (freenet.node.Node, main, NORMAL): Starting ticker.. > Aug 6, 2004 4:55:25 PM (freenet.node.Node, main, NORMAL): Starting > interfaces.. > Aug 6, 2004 4:55:25 PM (freenet.node.http.BookmarkManagerServlet, main, > NORMAL): Bookmarks updated on request > > > >> > >> The situation has not improved with 5089 or 5090. > >> > >> > >> Also, What's with 24mb seednodes? > >> > >> Isn't that starting to get excessive? Why do the refs have to be so large? > >> can they at least be compressed with winrar to make transport easier? > >> (though I expect that the monster seednodes.ref is part of the ultra long > >> time getting started... a few builds back with seednodes no more than 2mb > >> it was able to start up in about 5 min. > > > >They are, with bzip2. > >> > >> > >> Please excuse me for 'borrowing' the email addy, I like to post anon, if > >> there is an acceptable means to post to this list anonymously (via > >> remailers) please advise and I will change tactics. > > > >Anonymous remailers that support spoofing addresses are generally > >regarded as anti-social. Doesn't it have a generic default address? > > > remailer supports full from headers. it's not used with abuse in mind, but > anonymity with recognizeability. yeah, i know that many abuse such things, > esp on usenet. but in this case simply a means to post anon to a subscribe > only email list. as test however, this sent without custom from and see if > it makes it to the list.. if not, i'll put disclaimer at top and repost > this as quote with full from of somebody on the list. or is there an > acceptable anon 'from' i can use that will not have to be bounced or > reviewed by list management to get posted? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
