On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 01:48:12PM +0200, Anonymous wrote:
> >On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 07:47:50AM -0000, Toad wrote:
> >> As of build 5088 I'm getting startup times in excess of 145 minutes.
> >
> >Is it swapping much?
> 
> yes, disk is in full thrash.. cpu maxed.  other processes grinding to a
> halt.
> 
> >> This is counting from initiating freenet startup, to freenet being ready to
> >> deliver the web interface at 127.0.0.1:8888 in the browser.
> >> 
> >> latest everything, win98se
> >> 
> >> P 233
> >
> >How much RAM? How big datastore? What are the timings? i.e. show me the
> >log of the startup at logLevel=normal.
> 
> 64mb (best this mb will do)

Yikes. Well, good luck. :)

I will try to do something about memory usage seeding the RT, we're
getting many many complaints about it.
> 
> here's the log of last startup:
> 
> Aug 6, 2004 2:40:01 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Starting Freenet
> (Fred) 0.5 node, build #5090 on JVM Sun Microsystems Inc.:Java HotSpot(TM)
> Client VM:1.4.1_03-b02
> INFO: Native CPUID library
> 'freenet/support/CPUInformation/jcpuid-x86-windows.dll' loaded from
> resource
> INFO: Optimized native BigInteger library
> 'net/i2p/util/jbigi-windows-pentiummmx.dll' loaded from resource
> Aug 6, 2004 2:40:08 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, ERROR): overloadHigh set
> to 80% - this will NOT WORK with rate limiting
> Aug 6, 2004 2:40:13 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loading node
> keys: node
> Aug 6, 2004 2:40:14 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Read node file
> Aug 6, 2004 2:40:16 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): starting
> filesystem
> Aug 6, 2004 2:40:19 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loading data
> store
> Aug 6, 2004 2:40:19 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loading routing
> table
> Aug 6, 2004 2:40:20 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): From input:
> 1024.0
> Aug 6, 2004 2:40:20 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Setting default
> initTransferRate to 1024.0
> Aug 6, 2004 2:40:21 PM (freenet.node.rt.NGRoutingTable, main, NORMAL):
> Loading estimators
> Aug 6, 2004 2:40:22 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Created new NGRT
> Aug 6, 2004 2:40:23 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Loaded stats
> Aug 6, 2004 2:40:23 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loading temp
> bucket factory
> Aug 6, 2004 2:40:23 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loaded temp
> bucket factory
> Aug 6, 2004 2:40:23 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Loaded bucket
> factory
> Aug 6, 2004 4:55:04 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): read seed nodes
> Aug 6, 2004 4:55:04 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Initial refs
> count: 2, seeds: 607
> Aug 6, 2004 4:55:04 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): not seeding
> routing table
> Aug 6, 2004 4:55:06 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): saved routing
> table
> Aug 6, 2004 4:55:06 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): starting node
> Aug 6, 2004 4:55:17 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Detected Windows
> 98/ME. Limiting connections accordingly. To get rid of this message, use a
> proper operating system - sorry
> Aug 6, 2004 4:55:19 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loading service:
> mainport
> Aug 6, 2004 4:55:23 PM (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loading service:
> distribution
> Aug 6, 2004 4:55:24 PM
> (freenet.interfaces.servlet.SingleHttpServletContainer, main, NORMAL):
> Loading the single servlet distribution.params.servlet
> Aug 6, 2004 4:55:25 PM (freenet.node.Node, main, NORMAL): Starting ticker..
> Aug 6, 2004 4:55:25 PM (freenet.node.Node, main, NORMAL): Starting
> interfaces..
> Aug 6, 2004 4:55:25 PM (freenet.node.http.BookmarkManagerServlet, main,
> NORMAL): Bookmarks updated on request
> 
> 
> >> 
> >> The situation has not improved with 5089 or 5090.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Also, What's with 24mb seednodes?
> >> 
> >> Isn't that starting to get excessive?  Why do the refs have to be so large?
> >> can they at least be compressed with winrar to make transport easier?
> >> (though I expect that the monster seednodes.ref is part of the ultra long
> >> time getting started... a few builds back with seednodes no more than 2mb
> >> it was able to start up in about 5 min.
> >
> >They are, with bzip2.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Please excuse me for 'borrowing' the email addy, I like to post anon, if
> >> there is an acceptable means to post to this list anonymously (via
> >> remailers) please advise and I will change tactics.
> >
> >Anonymous remailers that support spoofing addresses are generally
> >regarded as anti-social. Doesn't it have a generic default address?
> 
> 
> remailer supports full from headers.  it's not used with abuse in mind, but
> anonymity with recognizeability. yeah, i know that many abuse such things,
> esp on usenet. but in this case simply a means to post anon to a subscribe
> only email list.  as test however, this sent without custom from and see if
> it makes it to the list.. if not, i'll put disclaimer at top and repost
> this as quote with full from of somebody on the list.   or is there an
> acceptable anon 'from' i can use that will not have to be bounced or
> reviewed by list management to get posted?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to