Toad schrieb:
THAT is interesting. We have repeatedly been fed the dogma that the JVM can handle this perfectly well by itself... I'm quite prepared to reinstate it if this is commonly seen... Having said that, reports of OOMs are rather rare - what did you set the memory limit to?
It's set to 192MB, I can't give it more because the system only has 256MB. But with the aggressiveGC it's enough for the node.
What's the CPU usage?
Currently somewhere between 20% and 40% with the regular 100% spikes of about 1 to 3 seconds while the GC runs. Without the aggressiveGC it doesn't have those spikes, unless it reaches the limit, then it goes mad.
failureTableSize was at 2000 failureTableItems was at 1000 failureTableTime was at 18000
I very much doubt it. The failure table does not DO anything - or very much. Look at the stats...
Hmmm, with the default settings the failure table fills quite fast here. It get's without problems above 10000 keys within 2 or 3 hours. With the smaller settings it's full within 30 to 40 minutes. This may be due frost or that my node is in the seednodes from time to time.
We will get rid of the failure table soon but this looks like a placebo to me...
Quite possible, like I said I'm not shure about this and measuring the the real performance of freenet on a comparable base is quite hard. It depends upon to much constantly changing factors.
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
