On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 07:06:25PM -0400, Jay Oliveri wrote: > On Tuesday 05 October 2004 02:16 pm, futureworlds wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Newsbyte" > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Well, that would depend on whome you ask, it seems (see discussion on > > > devl). > > > > > >*I* would suggest 1.5. > > > > > >But actually, there are no real big problems with 1.4.1, though there > > > WERE problems reported with the 1.4.2 on OSX, BSD and Linux. > > > > given win98se and being forced to run with only 64mb ram on a p233 > > > > what would you recommend? > > > > .... Besides getting a better computer and a DSL connection which i cant > > do. > > Not much you can do except run Freenet on at least NT4 or Win2K. Win98 > cannot handle an application like Freenet, and you might have too little > ram to even *make* it work.
Well, he could install linux, which is free. Win2K isn't. It sounds like he has money problems. Which probably means he has free time. ;) -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
