On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 05:59:56 -0800, "Sonax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:37:27 -0800 > >From: Todd Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Re: [freenet-support] ANNOUNCE: DFI (Dolphin's Freenet > >Index) is now back online! > > > >On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 01:06:46 +0000 (UTC), Conrad J. Sabatier > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/DFI// > > > >Since Fillament has decided to leave Freenet, and give up > >maintaining YoYo, maybe YoYo ought to be replaced with DFI. It > >wouldn't matter until there's a new build, of course, but the change > >could be made now. > > > >-todd I would be honored, for sure! :-) By the way, Toad, now's a good time to tell you how mightily impressed I am at how quickly my node got up to speed. In just a couple of days, my spider's database had pretty well fleshed itself out with all the currently available links. Nice! > If you read Fillament's last entry he plans to hand over the YoYo > privkey to anyone who get's yoyo running (he published the yoyo > software). I plan to (with fillaments help when i catch up with him > on IIP), to try and get YoYo running again. > So don't write off YoYo as dead just yet. I've been wondering what's up with YoYo; it's been pretty funky since I came back online. > I'm not saying that DFI should not be on the web-interface, but it > should not take YoYo's place. > If it should replace anything make it replace FIND (which is just a > DFI clone anyway), or CofE. > (If i get YoYo running there is no need for two sites on the web- > interface to go down when/if i mess up, "they" get to me, i go on > holiday, my hardware blows up etc.) Heh. :-) > Also, consider the fact that when the 0.7 starts to become somthing > that can be run, you might get two split networks (again), and my > guess is that dolphin will want to play with the big boys over at > unstable. I can't talk for dolphin, but that would be my guess. > Leaving stable without a updated spidered index (again) would be a > bad move. Actually, funny you mention that. I just enabled the "dual-network" hack on my node yesterday and seeded it with a bunch of stable and unstable nodes. So there's a good possibility that it could be a useable index for both branches. > But who says it should replace anything? Is there some magic limit > on the number of sites on the web-interface? > Why not just add DFI (and maby mr.X index also)? > > PS. Conrad, great to see you around again! :) Thanks. It's nice to be back. I'd forgotten how much I enjoyed tinkering with this stuff. :-) > If you have not already, you might wanna look into what Hopekiller > has done with your spider. > No need for you to fix things he has already fixed (or the other > way around). > [EMAIL PROTECTED]/hopeless-index/17//files/spider.r > ar Yes, I noticed that somewhere (on your site, I think). I'll have to check it out. Right now, I'm mainly preoccupied with getting all of the spider's database files up to snuff (mainly categorizing all the new sites that have come up while I was away), and also with tuning my node. I've been poring over Sun's docs, and I'm experimenting right now with running the JVM using FreeBSD's 1:1 thread mapping library (libthr.so) in conjunction with some of the more esoteric JVM command line options. Interesting stuff! :-) -- Conrad J. Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- "In Unix veritas" _______________________________________________ Support mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
