On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 07:02:30PM +0100, David Gubler wrote: > Hi > > This is my first post to this mailing list, so beware... > > If you set outputBandwidthLimit in the config file to a value above 500000 > (I did not try the exact value, but at 1000000 (1 MB/s) at least some of > the problems appear), Freenet gives Exceptions on the console and in the > log file, more specifically one Exception per attempted TCP connection (it > seems).
Hmmm. > ----- > ./start-freenet.sh > Detected freenet-ext.jar > Detected freenet.jar > Sun java detected. > Sun Java 1.4.2 detected. > Starting Freenet now: Command line: java -Xmx128m > -XX:MaxDirectMemorySize=128m freenet.node.MainDone > INFO: Native CPUID library > 'freenet/support/CPUInformation/libjcpuid-x86-linux.so' loaded from > resourceINFO: Optimized native BigInteger library > 'net/i2p/util/libjbigi-linux-pentium3.so' loaded from > resourcejava.lang.IllegalArgumentException: illegal (low) report: -Infinity! > at > > freenet.node.rt.TimeDecayingRunningAverage.report(TimeDecayingRunningAverage.java:162) > at freenet.node.Node.getGlobalQuota(Node.java:4623) > at freenet.PeerHandler.getRequestInterval(PeerHandler.java:1692) > at freenet.KeepaliveSender.run(KeepaliveSender.java:65) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534) Hmm. We check for division by 0 a few lines above... Does this happen a lot? > ----- > > and one sample Exception from the log: > > ----- > Jan 17, 2005 6:41:51 PM (freenet.support.io.NIOInputStream, YThread-26, > NORMAL): waited more than 120000ms in NIOIS.read() tcp/connection: > 39942>193.11.237.77:13885,[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > closingjava.lang.Exception: debug This is normal. :( The exception will not cause connections to get killed; it is never thrown, only logged. Whatever causes the timeouts might though. > at freenet.support.io.NIOInputStream.read(NIOInputStream.java:319) > at java.io.FilterInputStream.read(FilterInputStream.java:66) > at freenet.session.FnpLink.negotiateOutbound(FnpLink.java:637) > at freenet.session.FnpLink.solicit(FnpLink.java:202) > at > > freenet.session.FnpLinkManager.createOutgoing(FnpLinkManager.java:111) > at freenet.ConnectionJob.run(ConnectionJob.java:378) > at freenet.ConnectionJob.createConnection(ConnectionJob.java:78) > at freenet.node.ConnectionOpener.checkpoint(ConnectionOpener.java:95) > at > > freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint.checkpoint(Checkpoint.java:54) > at > > freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint.received(Checkpoint.java:47) > at freenet.node.StateChain.received(StateChain.java:177) > at freenet.node.StateChain.received(StateChain.java:61) > at > > freenet.node.StateChainManagingMessageHandler$ChainContainer.run(StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:335) > at > > freenet.node.StateChainManagingMessageHandler$ChainContainer.received(StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:288) > at > > freenet.node.StateChainManagingMessageHandler$ChainContainer.access$100(StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:207) > at > > freenet.node.StateChainManagingMessageHandler.handle(StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:99) > at freenet.Ticker$Event.run(Ticker.java:325) > at freenet.thread.YThreadFactory$YThread.run(YThreadFactory.java:285) > ----- > > > Other symptoms: > -Freenet tries to create connections as usual, but shortly after the > connection reaches the ESTABLISHED state (netstat), the connection gets > killed without transmitting any data-The "Open Connections" Page in the > Browser front-end misses at least one > table, only the menu and the "open connections" title are visible > What I tried: > -Kernel 2.6.10, Pentium 3 Mobile 800MHz, 384MB Ram > -Freenet version 5100, freenet-latest.tgz > -Java 1.4.2_06-b03, also tried 1.5, exctly the same symptoms (btw. on java > 1.5, freenet still says 1.4.2 on the console, altough the Environment page > correctly says 1.5)-Debian Sarge/Sid > -with or without export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 before launching the > startup script, this did not have any visible effect. I guess POSIX > threads are active on my system, but I don't really know-seednodes.ref from a > working node, did not help > > To me this looks like a float rounding problem (some value gets too close > to zero 'cause of a division by the bandwith value), but that's just a > guess. > You may think "why on earth would anyone set the bandwith to more than > 500kb/s", well I'm on a university line (sometimes) and I did want to try > how freenet behaves with that much bandwith... and afterall it took me an > awful lot of time to figure this out and I don't want others to run into > the same problems and waste their time as well :) Btw. google turned out > some people with similar problems, but noone seems to have found what > causes the problem. Did you try turning off the bandwidth limit altogether? > david > > PS: please forgive my spelling errors and such, my native language is > german... -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
