On 30 Aug 2006 03:27:04 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:01:06 +0100, you wrote:
>
> Freenet 0.5 had opennet, and yet it was a failure.
>
Ok, I gotta know this. How is 0.5 considered a failure. I use it daily and
it works flawlessly, Frost messages flow as well as ever, as do downloads of
splitfiles. Yesterday I retrieved a freesite that had not been updated in
two years and it was 100% intact. To me, that spells success.
"And now back to Frost"
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 08:44:42PM -0000, Hartmut Folter wrote:
> > Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet
> > failures-in-waiting until it proves itself, IMHO, by emerging out of alpha
> > with open-net.
> --
> Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
> ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
Crash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
