On Thursday 01 May 2008 16:20, sich wrote:
> Ermanno Baschiera a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > In my opinion a good bandwidth control system should be necessary. I
> > read that at the moment it's not very accurate. I think that all
> > people with low bandwidth can benefit from an accurate bandwidth
> > control. I mean... think about new comers who want to give a try
> > running Freenet... They keep the node up for some days... their MSN
> > starts to disconnect every 5 minutes, surfing becomes slow and they
> > often have to reload pages... even if they set their node's output
> > bandwidth to a resonable value. I'm afraid they at last could give up
> > and unistall freenet.
> > I had those problems, but with the last 3-4 builds, it happens much
> > less often, and I can't exclude that it could be my isp's fault (maybe
> > throttling?) or something else, not Freenet. Anyway, an accurate
> > bandwidth control cannot hurt.
> >
> > -Ermanno Baschiera
> For me the problem is that Freenet don't use all the bandwitch 
> avaible... I have very good bandwitch but Freenet is only using around 
> 40ko/s...

Do you have 0% pInstantReject as well? If so, your node is accepting every 
request sent to it, yet is still not using much bandwidth (compared to what 
it could do). Which is what I find on my node when I run with a high bwlimit: 
our neighbours simply don't send us enough requests to use up all the 
bandwidth, even taking into account that their neighbours are probably 
rejecting a lot of requests, so we probably get a lot of the rejected 
requests due to not being backed off.

I don't know that there's much that can be done about this. Load limiting 
adapts to the average network conditions, and we can't go too much beyond 
that without breaking routing.
> 
> sich

Attachment: pgpJB6l9p7f4j.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
[email protected]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to