My idea:
Interpose at least one "foreign IP address" between sender and recipient of
a same country.
The goal: isolate the sender and recipient.
The "foreign IP address" is a "country" that cooperates little, or doesn't
cooperate.
For example:
USA --> Venezuela --> USA
USA --> Russia --> Venezuela --> USA
China --> USA --> China
Etc.
Friends are unnecessary. The authorities and lobbies artists are more
difficult to trap users.

What do you think?


On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Luke771 <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:31:46 +0100
> "3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your reply.
> >
> >  I tried to block all traffic. Everything is blocked, except Freenet and
> > TOR.
> >
> > I wanted to allow only the IP ranges of some countries. And allow
> connection
> > to seednodes. This is an intermediate solution between darknet and
> opennet.
>
> No, this is nonsense.
> You can run darknet, opennet, or even both side by side, but there's no
> such thing as an 'intermediate solution' The idea of blocking whole
> countries (based on -what? biased information from the propaganda machine?)
> makes no sense at all. Please reconsider your position.
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
>
_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
[email protected]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to