I don't know if this has been reported. Finding info on freenet is hard. I'm now using 1230 with winxp pro. my computer is gaming spec device. Problem: The defragmenting of node.db4o is a cool idea. Doing it half assed and including it without testing is a bad idea. Not saying that has been done of course, just that if that was the case. Anyway.
1) There's no point defragging a small sized node.db4o 2) When it's large, say 800 KB (which happens within 2 days of use).. The defragmenting that happens at boot OR by restarting freenet while defragment is selected, takes so long that the starting service decides it's a great idea to tell me it's having trouble starting service since it's taking too long. In it's infinite wisdom, it leaves node.db4o fucked up with temp files on the side. Considering points 1 & 2. What's the point of having the defragging there at all?
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe