I don't know if this has been reported. Finding info on freenet is hard.

I'm now using 1230 with winxp pro. my computer is gaming spec device.
Problem: The defragmenting of node.db4o is a cool idea. Doing it half assed
and including it without testing is a bad idea. Not saying that has been
done of course, just that if that was the case.
Anyway.

1) There's no point defragging a small sized node.db4o
2) When it's large, say 800 KB (which happens within 2 days of use).. The
defragmenting that happens at boot OR by restarting freenet while defragment
is selected, takes so long that the starting service decides it's a great
idea to tell me it's having trouble starting service since it's taking too
long. In it's infinite wisdom, it leaves node.db4o fucked up with temp files
on the side.

Considering points 1 & 2. What's the point of having the defragging there at
all?
_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to