On 07/05/2014 08:10 AM, Wolfram Goetz wrote: > Hello, > > which indicator is more important for the overall performance of Freenet: > The input/output rates or the access rates? Or is it something else? > > I'm asking because I'm currenty running a dedicated Freenet machine on > Kubuntu 14.04 and I wonder if I still have a CPU bottleneck. Hardware is a > Celeron G1620 (Ivy Bridge, 2x 2.7 GHz), 4TB 3,5'' 5900rpm HDD, had upgraded > from a much slower AMD E-350 (2x 1,6 GHz, less IPC). > > The system info says the CPU is rarely above 50% load. But I get slower > input/output rates than on a faster machine (i5-2500k @ 4x 4.0 GHz, Windows > 7, system on a SSD, Freenet on a 7.200rpm HDD) with a test install of > freenet. It's roughly 150KiB/s vs. 300 KiB/s. Access rates do not differ > that much: About 15/s vs. 17/s.
Hm, I'm not sure. I'm not aware of many people profiling Freenet. The thing that stands out to me is the machine getting less throughput has a slower (5900 RPM vs 7200 RPM) hard drive. Are the datastores the same size? Are success rates different? > Best regards, > > Wolfram
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
