Actually... should we put the DBR into the client key? We could easily have a few extra bytes in the key, and dispense with the need for a redirect.
So SSK@<pubkey>,<cryptokey>,<extra>,<type - D in this case><data for D>/ On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 06:09:18PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > I was about to code DBRs to have an interval and offset in seconds. > > However... do we want to support calendar units in DBRs? > > In other words, do we want people to be able to do DBRs that are updated > every calendar month, or every calendar year? > > My gut feeling is yes, we do. > > Any opposition? -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20051022/33139cb2/attachment.pgp>
