The reason for this is that it is very difficult to implement premix
routing on a darknet, especially if you want reasonable performance.
However on a darknet you are less likely to need premix routing,
hopefully.

On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 06:09:58PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Pre-mix routing will be introduced after 0.7, but will not be  
> supported in 0.7.0 (the first release in the 0.7 series).  It will  
> likely be implemented once the initial 0.7 releases are stable.
> 
> Ian.
> 
> On 3 Oct 2005, at 14:01, Duana Saskia STANLEY wrote:
> 
> >
> >I am 90% sure it doesn't and that pre-mix routing was supposed to  
> >be introduced in 0.7.  I've read the dev notes and some tech emails  
> >which suggest it may not be implemented after all.
> >
> >My friend thinks its in use with the current version of freenet.
> >
> >So, could you please confirm whether it is currently implemented  
> >and if not, what the vauge plans for it are?  (Is it still on the  
> >"roadmap"?)
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Support mailing list
> >Support at freenetproject.org
> >http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> >Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/ 
> >listinfo/support
> >Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at 
> http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20051005/b799861c/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to