Well... yeah. :| You can keep using 0.5. And there will be a TCP transport plugin, eventually, but probably not before 0.7.0.
However in your case I rather suspect freenet 0.7.0 would just work, even with UDP. UDP port forwarding should not normally be necessary. If you know the IP of the other end, and it knows yours, you can connect, unless your router is *really* whacky. On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 12:34:08PM +0200, Level 13 wrote: > I know it probably sounds silly, but for some time I've been using a > router that doesn't support UDP port forwarding, and I probably won't > change it any time soon... I see the 0.7 is switching from TCP to UDP. > What happens to those unlucky users who can't use UDP? Should we just > stop using Freenet until we get a better router / portforwarding > support? -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050919/ecbe746d/attachment.pgp>
