No, but it might not cache it in the first place if it's the result of a local request. This is to beat the Register attack. Unfortunately it means that you are highly vulnerable to your immediate neighbours. It is possible to increase the effort needed to break your anonymity somewhat at the cost of performance.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 10:16:02AM +0100, Volodya Mozhenkov wrote: > I have heard somewhere that in the 0.7 your node might chose not to give a > block that it has, in order to protect the anonymity. Is that true? If so > will that also apply at HTL=0? -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050922/ce66ac6d/attachment.pgp>
