Yes I am referring to 0.7. No feature work will be done for 0.5.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 11:07:05AM +0200, Level 13 wrote: > That's not very encouraging. Perhaps there should be some flag > available to let other nodes know that one of them is just > "temporarily unavailable". Or maybe an option for a "3rd party" server > where the traffic requests would be rerouted - and the "temporarily > unavailable" answer given out (the "3rd party" router probably being > another (web?) server to which the DynDNS would point for a while). > > BTW, what do you guys mean by "people drop nodes" and "people can > see"? I thought the _system_ was automatically selecting the nodes? Or > are you referring to 0.7 only? -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060728/01f09720/attachment.pgp>
