Well it shouldn't go a lot above 256M. I can't see it going over 512M.
Short of a JVM bug. You are talking about resident here, not virtual.
Virtual going high is perfectly normal and pretty harmless.

On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 06:57:11PM -0500, CyberLeo wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >I run my nodes in -Xmx100M. Well recently it's been 256 thanks to the
> >wrapper. Were you downloading many huge files? The JVM will not use a
> >gigabyte of RAM unless you actually tell it that it can. If it's using
> >(much) more than your -Xmx setting, then there is a bug _in the JVM_. It
> >should OOM and fail. So what was your -Xmx setting (if you are using the
> >wrapper, wrapper.java.maxmemory in wrapper.conf) ?
> 
> wrapper.conf:
> wrapper.java.maxmemory=256
> 
> ps axwwwopid,user,state,command :
> 31110 freenet  S java -Xms128m -Xmx256m -Djava.library.path=lib
> -classpath lib/wrapper.jar:freenet-cvs-snapshot.jar:freenet-ext.jar
> -Dwrapper.key=PII4PXFbPlyaUE0E -Dwrapper.port=32000
> -Dwrapper.jvm.port.min=31000 -Dwrapper.jvm.port.max=31999
> -Dwrapper.pid=31108 -Dwrapper.version=3.2.0
> -Dwrapper.native_library=wrapper -Dwrapper.ignore_signals=TRUE
> -Dwrapper.service=TRUE -Dwrapper.cpu.timeout=10 -Dwrapper.jvmid=1
> org.tanukisoftware.wrapper.WrapperSimpleApp freenet.node.Node
> 
> I'm assuming the 'Resident' size is the one controlled by -Xmx, as that
> number had never been above 256mb in the past, but now is definitely
> rising beyond that limit.
> 
> I will upgrade to Sun Java 1.5.0_07 and see if this takes care of the issue.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --
> Fuzzy love,
> -CyberLeo
> Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/
> 

-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060602/aa53a8be/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to