After a couple of days: 23330 freenet 24 1 546m 267m 4960 S 0.0 26.5 105:17.81 java
RES is now almost double... :-? What could be the cause of this...? Regards, Evert Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 01:06:51PM +0100, Evert wrote: >> And will RES remain more or less constant, or will it increase with uptime? > > It should be stable. >> Regards, >> Evert >> >> Matthew Toseland wrote: >>> On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 15:25 +0100, Evert wrote: >>>> Hi all! >>>> >>>> I have a newbie(?) question about memory use of Freenet. From top: >>>> >>>> PID user PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND >>>> 6801 freenet 26 1 524m 140m 10m S 10.2 13.9 3:59.21 java >>>> >>>> Why is VIRT 524m? That seems like quite a bit for a freenet-config that is >>>> set to use 101M, or am I wrong? >>> You are wrong. VIRT has very little to do with the actual memory usage; >>> it's RES that matters. Which is reasonable - 101M plus JVM overheads. >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Support mailing list >>> Support at freenetproject.org >>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support >>> Unsubscribe at >>> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support >>> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
