-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> So in summary, for the small file the two networks were comparable -
> 1:30ish vs 2:00ish. For the ISO, I'm not sure if there was any
> conclusion?
>
> My 2 cents: Inserts are much faster after the changes to load limiting
> just before xmas, or at least, they should be. Generally freenet 0.7
> uses close to the bandwidth limit now, which it certainly didn't before.
>
> Comments?
In the moments when my node is not backed off my large inserts are doing great.
I don't
think i could achieve such speeds on the dead-net. However, those breathe
periods between
back-off are far and few in between, so over-all, inserts are quite slow for me
now. I
think in the past 24 hours i've managed to insert around 15-20MiB.
- Volodya
- --
http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast
http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki
http://www.kingstonstudents.org/ Kingston University students' forum
"None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFvIyMuWy2EFICg+0RAlhuAKDJSblHZSb1A/zr2deRDkudQ0lp7wCeLNnD
krA8xVZmXZ7r2s44oRiAFDc=
=imJP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
