On Wednesday 30 April 2008 14:11, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Matthew Toseland > <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > > On Wednesday 30 April 2008 02:47, vinyl1 wrote: > > > I think the lack of a reliable messaging system is really going to impact > > > interest in Freenet. Unfortunately, FMS is not easily usable by ordinary > > > end users, and it is not packaged with the core software. > > > > Nothing we can do. FMS and Frost are separate projects. We're not bundling > > Frost because it doesn't work, and we're not bunding FMS for other reasons. > > And we don't want to delay the release while waiting for third party devs who > > may or may not get their act together. > > Currently I am very busy with my real life. > > The question to toad could be: what could YOU do to support reliable > messaging systems? > I am not sure if fms using ULPRs is the final solution for freenet messaging... > > The problem started when the spammer used KSK redirects to invalid or > missing data. > What was the reason not to add a KSK like key type that works like on 0.5? > Maximum size 32K, must be inserted in one piece. Wouldn't this help? I think so.
Why would it help? > > > > I don't know what to do about this problem, other than figure out some way > > > to get Frost working again. This is really too bad, because the core > > > functionality of Freenet seems to be improving. All the popular sites load > > > very quickly, it is almost getting to be like the regular internet. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080430/d02f481d/attachment.pgp>
