On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:09:51 +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tuesday 13 January 2009 19:02, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:13 +0100, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: > > > With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is > > > increased by 20 percent. > > > > > > With 1196, CHK time is between 4 and 7 seconds. My bandwith is > > > reduced by 85 percent! And I have only 1 or 2 nodes connected > > > (the others are backed off), often all nodes are backed off! > > > > I am not backed off from anybody, BUT ALL MY TRAFFIC IS BLOCKED :|. > > > > Everything is preemptively rejected, due to "Transfer speed > > (output)". > > I thought you said (on IRC) that you weren't connected anywhere > because you didn't update?
That was with 1195. With 1196 I do seem able to connect. Currently on opennet, for example, I am connected to 9, and disconnected from 9. The strangers stat's page shows some data flowing between my peers, 0% overload probability, %Time routable ~99.9% for the connected nodes, and 100% for the disconnected nodes :P.
