oops misreading of version nummer 4562 > 4488 *cough*
question remains, if there is a newer version of opkg in fso-testing fixing the bug #1695? should i install from unstable? greetings malte malte wrote: > Hello > > I have a problem upgrading opkg, the installed version is > > 0.1.4+svnr4562-r0 > > which is known to be buggy: https://docs.openmoko.org/trac/ticket/1695 > > my feeds point to http://shr.bearstech.com/fso-testing/.. (all of them) > installed image: fso milestone 2, without upgrades > > what i do: > > # opkg update > > works ok, looking into /var/lib/opkg/fso-armv4t says: > > Package: opkg > Version: 0.1.4+svnr4488-r0 > > as expected > > # opkg install opkg > Package opkg (0.1.4+svnr4562-r0) installed in root is up to date. > > This is not expected! Why is it 'up to date'? > > Ok - trying to force feed > > # opkg install > http://shr.bearstech.com/fso-testing/ipk/armv4t/opkg_0.1.4+svnr4488-r0_armv4t.ipk > Downloading > http://shr.bearstech.com/fso-testing/ipk/armv4t/opkg_0.1.4+svnr4488-r0_armv4t.ipk > Multiple packages (opkg and opkg) providing same name marked HOLD or > PREFER. Using latest. > Multiple packages (opkg and opkg) providing same name marked HOLD or > PREFER. Using latest. > Package opkg (0.1.4+svnr4562-r0) installed in root is up to date. > > HOLD or PREFER explain the unexpected behavior. > > My questing is: Where/How can I change this setting, allowing opkg to > upgrade itself. > > greetings > malte > > _______________________________________________ > support mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support _______________________________________________ support mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support
