Long story short: ignore it.

Scott


On 7/22/05, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/22/05, alan walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Jul 22 09:51:11
> >
> > kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 10.250.3.1 (!AF_LINK)
> >
> > Jul 22 09:51:11
> >
> > kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 192.168.168.10 (!AF_LINK)
> >
> > Jul 22 09:51:11
> >
> > kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 192.168.168.8 (!AF_LINK)
> >
> >
> > Jul 22 09:51:11
> >
> > kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 10.250.3.1 (!AF_LINK)
> >
> > Jul 22 09:51:11
> >
> > kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 192.168.168.10 (!AF_LINK)
> >
> > Jul 22 09:51:11
> >
> > kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 192.168.168.8 (!AF_LINK)
> >
> >
> 
> Scott will have to answer this one definitively, but here's some
> background info.  Everything I've seen says this is caused by "a
> screwed routing table".  Also seems to be a known CARP issue.
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/lucky.freebsd.pf/browse_thread/thread/8f861c8f6036a1d3/230215e48dca5411?q=%22arp_rtrequest:+bad+gateway+%22&rnum=3&hl=en#230215e48dca5411
> 
> hell it even seems to happen on OpenBSD
> http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=%22arp_rtrequest:+bad+gateway+%22&start=0&scoring=d&hl=en&lr=&;
> 
> and from the FreeBSD archives:
> 
> --
> The ARP entries are stored in the routing table.  A valid ARP
> entry has a link-type gateway address.  If your routing table
> is misconfigured, it's possible that gateway will be something
> else -- then the kernel whines.
> --
> 
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/mailing.freebsd.net/browse_thread/thread/1f2dc2ca79375e85/45ab37b002b8dda7?q=%22arp_rtrequest:+bad+gateway+%22&rnum=1&hl=en#45ab37b002b8dda7
> 
> -cmb
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to