On 8/11/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So... you all say that it is better to leave the things as they are.. Ok, I > trust you. > But in the remote possibility that I become crazy and start to develope > something like the thing I imagined, I will share it with you! >
well not crazy, it's just not something Bruce had the time to spend on. His words were something like "NICs are cheap, and my time is very limited". That doesn't help much when you have an embedded box with only two interfaces though. The only thing you have to keep in mind, if you do this, is that the interface that is bridged cannot have an IP. If you're going to allow bridging LAN to WAN, LAN can't have an IP. I'm sure, like m0n0wall, there are a ton of reasons that LAN really needs an IP right now, and removing it could cause all kinds of undesirable side effects, unless you do significant testing and make sure all that gets fixed. -cmb --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
