Perhaps block this rule on the LAN interface before the ALL all?

On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Ullrich ha scritto:
> 
> >What was generating the traffic?
> >
> >
> it was a normal broadcast to port 137-138 in network 9.0 that for some
> strange reason pass to other network.
> 
> regards, Rodolfo
> 
> 
> >On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Scott Ullrich ha scritto:
> >>
> >>I solved putting a blocking rule in lan to stop port 138.
> >>No more interrupt storm as you can see from top:
> >>
> >>last pid:  2266;  load averages:  0.15,  0.05,  0.04    up 0+00:29:37
> >>18:33:12
> >>22 processes:  1 running, 21 sleeping
> >>CPU states:  0.0% user,  0.8% nice,  3.1% system,  0.4% interrupt, 95.7%
> >>idle
> >>Mem: 13M Active, 7492K Inact, 10M Wired, 24K Cache, 9824K Buf, 86M Free
> >>Swap:
> >>
> >>regards, Rodolfo
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Any chance of doing a tcpdump and see if a packet appears to be stuck in a 
> >>>loop?
> >>>
> >>>Scott
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Scott Ullrich ha scritto:
> >>>>
> >>>>In my opinion the bug is still here.
> >>>>The light (that indicate traffics) of the NIC (wan1 and wan2), are still.
> >>>>And after I halt the secondary, and the webgui of primary is usuable,
> >>>>the traffic of the interfaces (1 and 2)  is more than 100 Megabytes
> >>>>
> >>>>regards
> >>>>Rodolfo
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>There was a bug in previous versions that would send the machine into
> >>>>>a interrupt storm due to a route bug.   Your on a later version than
> >>>>>this so I really dont know what to say here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Scott
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Scott Ullrich ha scritto:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>sorry, I meant outbound load balancing
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>regards
> >>>>>>Rodolfo
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Bill Marquette ha scritto:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>standard soekris 4801 + 2 lan
> >>>>>>>>traffic? in that moment zero
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>and it happens only with carp+load balance with two boards
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>When you say load balancing do you mean arp balancing?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Scott
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to