I think I understand what you mean. It seems that your solution is correct scott
thanks -----Original Message----- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 September 2005 15:45 To: Gary Buckmaster Cc: alan walters; [email protected] Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] filtered bridge On 9/6/05, Gary Buckmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alan, > > You want to create outbound allow rules for the NIC facing the particular > machines in question. Assuming OPT1 is your internet-facing NIC and you > want a machine on the network segment serviced by OPT2 to be able to make > outbound connections, your allow rule will need to be applied to OPT2. > Always remember to create the rules for the NIC that will see the traffic > first. I'm not so sure this is the answer. Since he doesn't have the interfaces bridged to a WAN port it would be no different from needing NAT for your optional interfaces. So it sounds like it needs a NAT mapping for each of the subnets behind the bridges (since its not bridged to a wan port). Maybe I misread, I was very sick yesterday. Scott --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
