At 10:48 AM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
On 9/29/05, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i assumed he had all that correct, since he said
> he could see the traffic going into the pfsense
> port. i was going to ask the same question,
> myself. this has to be a config problem, as i'm using this exact
same setup.
I agree, which is why I asked the obvious question :) Not everyone
realizes that marking a port with multiple vlans doesn't mean that
it's a tagged port, just that the machine on that port can see and
talk to each of the vlans (untagged). That of course would require
pfSesne to support real interface aliases - which we don't (and I'm
not yet convinced is required)
I just went back and reviewed my switch config (it's an smc
tigerswitch). Maybe he didn't actually see the traffic entering the
pfsense unit. If so, I'm betting you're right and he forgot to mark
its switch port as tagged. I remember when I first tried this, I
forgot that and it drove me nuts - no connectivity, and I couldn't see why not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
