Hello, I am going to try Pfsense next week, it sure will be a great product. Very nice work! I have been looking for something like this for a LONG time! You might see what Cyberoam is using, to get some ideas maybe. www.cyberoam.com. The software, not the CR series. It is based on Linux or a UNIX, but very expensive! It looks great, but have not tried it yet, waiting for pfsense to leave alfa! But will try it on 190 machines in my network.....Yes, I know it is ALPHA!
Thanks Ciro ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Marquette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <support@pfsense.com> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 10:35 PM Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Questions about Load Balancing Or another suggestion, something that I would do here if my second connection wasn't 10x faster than the primary is to say send gaming out one link and send browsing out the other. :) --Bill On 9/29/05, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not unique, we just don't have an easy way to implement ratio based > load balancing at this time. BTW, it'd be connection based anyway, > not true bandwidth balancing. I'd recommend putting some clients on > one connection, some on the other and manually balance the links using > rules. > > --Bill > > On 9/29/05, Wesley K. Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Scott, is there a solution to this? Am I unique in that I have multiple > > WAN connections of different capacities? > > > > Anyone have another solution? > > > > Thanks > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thu 9/29/2005 7:20 PM > > To: support@pfsense.com > > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Questions about Load Balancing > > > > > > > > Load balancing uses round robin. > > > > Scott > > > > > > On 9/29/05, Wesley K. Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Greetings, I have a Squid PROXY server that I want to use two DSL > > > connections that I have with. However, one of them is a 1 megabit > > > connection and the other is a 512kbps connections. Based on what I have > > > read on the list, I am concerned that the load balancing algorithm will > > > NOT distribute 2/3 and 1/3 of the combined 1.5mbps for the outgoing > > > traffic over the two connections respectively. Am I incorrect in this? > > > Will it maximize each connection if they are of difference capacities? > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
