On 10/18/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mmmh, sounds very strange.. IPsec NAT-T usually is achieved as IPsec over > UDP.. > (http://wiki.openswan.org/index.php/Firewalls) > ...and from what I know, Cisco VPN is using exaclty this. > > What kind of implementation is currently used? > > Please, could someone check if pfSense is really encapsulating over > 4500/UDP, or smthg different?
pfSense isn't encapsulating anything, that's the job of the client. In this case it sounds like the client needed some extra config to do NAT-T correctly. --Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
