On 10/23/05, jonathan gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bill, > > your options are quite valid, but anyway, exporting to netflow, a rule > number in the log line will help so much.
The rule numbers are in the log line I thought? At any rate, since we add numerous rules depending on features activated, the rule numbers don't help a heck of a lot (usually). I'll take this into consideration though, it kind of goes in line with something I've been wanting to do for some time (along with alot of other things I've been wanting to do for some time). > Would be posible to achieve this in a "low cost of time" fashion? Do the > developers find this interesing for 'your' product? Add pfflowd, it's already a package. As for syslog, use our built in syslog daemon to remote syslog, it works today. Low cost for the rule numbers? Not really (and be effective). It's interesting, but unlikely to be added until it can be done right - which will take some decent amount of development (to fit into _my_ idea of right - obviously someone else might make changes based on their idea of right :)) --Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
