As a note/addition, does WinMX even exist anymore?  That preset could be
removed.

Nelson Papel

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Wolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 14:22
To: [email protected]
Subject: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaper Presets

Just a few comments... first off, the rules for Shareaza and Gnutella 
seem to be identical, so you might choose to either remove Shareaza, or 
rename it to Gnutella 2- and have it shape TCP as well as UDP packets on 
6346 since G2 uses both protocols, instead of only TCP (which would be 
Gnutella).  Secondly, it lists MSN, ICQ, and IRC for changing 
priorities, why not AIM?  It uses port 5190, and since this is pretty 
common knowledge, couldn't this be added easily to the wizard?  I know 
it could be added manually, but if it could be added easily to the 
wizard then it would save a small bit of work for the user if they 
wanted to shape AIM traffic.  Also, maybe you could add more games to 
the list? =)  If you have spare time anyway, as I know there are other 
things with a much higher priority than all of this.  Some examples 
would be Lineage II: 2106, 2009, 7777 TCP Inbound and Outbound (the last 
port there is also used by a few other games including UT); GunZ Online 
7700 UDP Inbound and Outbound; virtually any Blizzard game aside from 
WoW and WC3 (Starcraft, Warcraft II, Diablo II) as well as the game 
Guild Wars: 6112 TCP In/Out; Warcraft III: 6112-6119 TCP In/Out; World 
of Warcraft: 3724 TCP In/Out.  There are a bazillion more games that 
could be added, but those are the ones I had to make queues for myself 
since they weren't in the magical wizard thing.  One last thing, you 
might want to automatically move the queues with the huge ranges to the 
bottom of the priority list, as to not screw up the nice ones that use 
only one port inside of those huge ranges... example would be 
battlefield 2 at UDP ports 1500 through 4999 or EQ at TCP 1024 through 6000.

Thanks for reading all that, and great work on 0.94.10... having zero 
problems and I followed the upgrade path from 0.90a to 0.94.2 to 0.94.4 
to 0.94.8 to 0.94.10, no major problems for me on any of these using one 
WAN and one LAN interface, each on the xl driver.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to