On 11/30/05, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right. The hope is to remove ipfw from base. There's nothing in
pfSense core that absolutely requires ipfw (although certain
functionality that we decided not to rewrite for 1.0 currently is
written to use ipfw).
--Bill
On 11/30/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even if we dump it from the scripts, we will keep the module around
> for packages, etc.
>
> Scott
>
>
> On 11/30/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi guys!
> > Sorry, I read the last thread about captive portal, and from what I
> > understood it is in plan to abandon ipfw. Does this means that in the future
> > (e.g v1.0) it is planned to remove the ipfw kernel module? I am using ipfw
> > for integrating pfsense with p3scan, so I would like to ask you if it is
> > possible to maintain that module anyway.
> > Thank you very very much.
> >
> > Tom
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
