FYI, a discussion threat on the PF mailing list................. and a
pointer to an interesting blog entry.
_F
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: PFSense?
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 00:11:19 +0100
From: Tobias Weisserth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [email protected]
References:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi there,
On Sunday 01 January 2006 23:08, Charles Sprickman wrote:
..
Any comments on this project? I do like the idea of being able to drop a
fairly sophisticated "appliance" at a client site that uses pf...
http://www.weisserth.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=74&Itemid=82
The problem is having unnecessary services exposed on a firewall machine (in
order to have the web interface).
pf is easy enough to configure "manually" in contrast to iptables.
This is of course just my opinion.
kind regards,
Tobias W.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
