Should we be using this "vendor" tree of theirs instead? On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yea, I need to follow up on that. I think Harti addressed the buildworld > issues, but I'm not sure. I recall there were some fixes added when he > imported it to his bsnmp vendor tree. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:59 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > In addition the SoC patches was crashing our build so we backed them > out. > > On 1/17/06, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > This has been added to the next version of bsnmp from what I > understand (see > > Sumer of Code patches for bsnmp) but the new version of bsnmpd hasn't > been > > released yet. I also don't have a ETA. > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > From: John Cianfarani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 7:01 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [pfSense Support] CPU Mib > > > > > > > > Is there a mib for polling CPU on pfsense, I went through the entire > walk > > and tried some of the standard ones but couldn't find it. > > > > > > > > John > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
