Yes. On 3/25/06, Bart Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, are you saying in my case where I utilize NAT 1:1, I'm out of luck? > > Bart > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Holger Bauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 2:21 PM > Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] NATed services by the public IP > > > enable nat reflection at system>advanced. This will only work for > portforwards, not 1:1 nat. > > Holger > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bart Fisher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 8:24 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [pfSense Support] NATed services by the public IP > > > > > > OK, I'm an idot. > > > > In FAQ: > > > > Limitations > > > > Is it possible to access NATed services by the public IP > > address from LAN? > > > > Yes! pfSense now includes a work around for this common > > limitation of most > > open source and commercial firewalls. > > > > Hmm, not very helpful... > > > > How do you set this up? I'm sure this has been answered > > before but can't > > find it. Could someone create a dummies guide for the 'work around' ? > > > > Bart > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > ____________ > Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
