Compiled with -O2 and fully stripped (w/documentation, helpers, etc - standard Gentoo build), my tools report to me that ntp.org's size is concordant with that of it's most recent source tarball - about 2.3M. If the same holds for OpenNTP, I'd expect it to be roughly 140k.
I have a system with a poor clock - I'll run some drift tests on it with OpenNTP and see if anything concerns me; I start hyperventilating at a few milliseconds' drift. ;-) RB On 4/4/06, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/4/06, Randy B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And yes, we are open to replacing it with something else if someone > > > wants to do the plubming. > > > > If given the choice between ntp.org > > (http://ntp.isc.org/bin/view/Main/NTPcopyrightStatement) and OpenNTP > > (OpenBSD), which would you prefer? > > Don't know that it makes a difference - both licenses look OK. > OpenNTP is certainly the more secure of the two, but I have seen > complaints about clock precision with it (food for thought, I honestly > don't find it to be an issue and don't need my clock accurate to the > picosecond...but hey, I don't count ;-P) OpenNTP has my vote > personally (and is probably smaller than ntp.org - just a guess). > > --Bill > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
