Not I, said the fly... Just as I thought I'd get some development time at home, my job made a big shift. I did encourage Joshua to go ahead and pursue it and not wait for me, but I've not seen anything since.
The easiest way would probably be OpenNTP - it's incredibly lightweight and simple. However, there seems to be some concern about it abusing NTP servers; I have no personal experience with that, so I leave that answer to those who do. RB On 5/26/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone have any luck with this? Msntp has some serious problems resolving custom dns names it seems. It's gotta go. ;) On 4/11/06, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/11/06, Randy B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 4/5/06, Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ISC's ntp is well known and understood and considered very accurate. > > > I see no other choice. > > > > > > > > After Running OpenNTP for a while now, I feel less uncomfortable with it - > > after the first 12 hours or so, the clock swings (+/-12ms) evened out, and > > it's staying quite comfortably within +/- 2-3ms with very little jitter. In > > the following output of 'ntpq -c peers', the system in question is > > 'balrog-priv'; note the odd reference clock - I think that's an artifact of > > the minimal implementation that doesn't allow that level of querying. In > > fact, for the most part it seems to stay well within 1ms (it refers to > > no-such-system, dies-irae, and the local system I'm querying from). > > I might have to give it a try on my boxes (running OpenBSD) at work. > ISC ntpd can't keep the clock sync'd when you have lots of jitter > (which we do - due to traffic loads on the box trying to be sync'd). > It eventually gives up attempting to sync the clock. A ntp daemon > "that works" it better than an ntp daemon that when it works, is > millisecond precise, but "doesn't work". FWIW, when a carp pair gets > it's dates out of sync by more than a second or two, hilarity ensues > and it's _not_ a pretty sight (that was my joy first thing yesterday > morning). > > --Bill > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
